Damien Hirst Sued for Allegedly Copying Jewelry Design

New York--Two artists and jewelry designers are involved in a legal battle in New York federal court over their respective lines of jewelry inspired by prescription drugs.

Canadian artist Colleen Wolstenholme, who, according to court documents filed by her attorney, “produces works in a wide range of media including jewelry, painting, sculpture, embroidery, and digital collage,” first introduced her pill sculptures and jewelry, the work for which she is most known, in 1996.

Wolstenholme’s tribute to pharmaceutical drugs, such as Prozac and Percocet, is a comment on today’s quick-fix society, and her pairing of pills with jewelry expands this statement into a dialogue on female oppression.

Court documents state that Wolstenholme combined two ideas in executing these designs: one, that jewelry, particularly engagement rings, are a way for men to lay claim to women; and two, that pharmaceutical drugs are disproportionately prescribed to females.

Damien Hirst, purportedly the United Kingdom’s wealthiest living artist, rose to fame in the 1990s as part of the YBA, or Young British Artists, movement. He is most well-known for his works which preserve animals in formaldehyde and his spot designs.

Hirst also uses pharmaceutical pills as a theme in his work. He created large-scale pill cabinet sculptures from 2007 to 2010.

He also sells silver and gold pill jewelry, which is the disputed work addressed in the lawsuit, through his retail company Other Criteria, which sells his work online and in its New York store, where it is headquartered.

Hirst also collaborated with fine jewelry brand Hoorsenbuhs on a pill-themed collection in 2014.

In court documents, Wolstenholme’s attorney asserts that, “Hirst knew of Wolstenholme and the Wolstenholme works as early as March 1998, if not earlier, and had access to the works” and “began creating, distributing, displaying and selling the infringing works as early as 2004.”

Wolstenholme is suing Hirst and Other Criteria for copyright infringement under the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, copyright infringement under the Canadian Copyright Act, and unfair competition.

“When viewed side by side, the works and the infringing works are identical and/or substantially similar,” court documents state.

While Wolstenholme has thus far been denied copyright protection from the United States, she is currently re-applying for protection of a specific pill charm bracelet, which grants her legal ground to sue.

Additionally, the United States and Canada are parties to The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, which “provides